Gaming operations combine high transaction volumes with fast-moving player activity, which makes unusual behaviour harder to spot. Common exposures include laundering through minimal-play deposits and withdrawals, chip walking and structuring at land-based venues, third-party funding of player accounts, and sanctions or PEP exposure among players and beneficial owners.

Through a risk-based programme applied across the player lifecycle: identity verification and screening at registration, a documented player risk assessment, monitoring of deposits, withdrawals and play patterns, and enhanced due diligence for higher-risk players. Keeping those steps connected produces consistent decisions and an audit trail regulators can follow.

Yes. Players, beneficial owners and other relevant parties can be screened against sanctions, PEP, watchlist and adverse media data at registration, with ongoing re-screening as lists change or negative news emerges between reviews.

Monitoring rules can flag patterns associated with laundering through gaming: deposits followed by withdrawal with little or no play, funding from unrelated third parties, activity inconsistent with a player's profile, and structuring below reporting thresholds. Flagged activity routes to case management with player and screening context attached.

ZIGRAM connects player screening, risk assessment, transaction monitoring and investigation in a single workflow backed by global risk intelligence, giving gaming operators a clearer view of player risk and the records needed to evidence compliance across jurisdictions.